http://health.india.com/news/vilasrao-deshmukh-showing-signs-of-improvement/ Health on India.com Sun, 19 May 2013 04:23:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://health.india.com/news/vilasrao-deshmukh-showing-signs-of-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-23277 Fabrycio Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:08:53 +0000 http://health.india.com/?post_type=news&p=17911#comment-23277 errr. to each his own is being judgmental of other pleope's choices now, is it? > SRK was shamelessly promoting his film what is shameless about promoting a film? what is a shameful (or shame aware) promotion of a film? how does saying hokey is/was one of my favorite sport morally oblige anyone to actually go and watch a hockey match.i agree that state must not pamper cricket, but expecting an actor to go around being charitable to some game because he acted in a movie on that theme is really really irrational. he has a right to watch or not watch, promote or not promote, any game, any movies, that he chooses to. for all the pretenses at liberalism, what you're doing is deciding what other pleope should do. this is not a question of honesty. it's a question of priorities. hockey may or may not be his favorite game (only he knows what happened to taking things at face value?). but even if it is, he still has a right to set his priorities. business first, social service (including that to a sport) later, if at all, or whatever. who are we to set them for him, or anyone?regards,asuph. errr. to each his own is being judgmental of other pleope’s choices now, is it? > SRK was shamelessly promoting his film what is shameless about promoting a film? what is a shameful (or shame aware) promotion of a film? how does saying hokey is/was one of my favorite sport morally oblige anyone to actually go and watch a hockey match.i agree that state must not pamper cricket, but expecting an actor to go around being charitable to some game because he acted in a movie on that theme is really really irrational. he has a right to watch or not watch, promote or not promote, any game, any movies, that he chooses to. for all the pretenses at liberalism, what you’re doing is deciding what other pleope should do. this is not a question of honesty. it’s a question of priorities. hockey may or may not be his favorite game (only he knows what happened to taking things at face value?). but even if it is, he still has a right to set his priorities. business first, social service (including that to a sport) later, if at all, or whatever. who are we to set them for him, or anyone?regards,asuph.

]]>